EnigmA Amiga Run 1995 November/EnigmA AMIGA RUN 02 (1995)(G.R. Edizioni)(IT)[!][issue 1995-11][Skylink CD].iso/earcd/docs/lwml9505.lha/LWML9505.TXT/[e-mail]_Sat May 20 22:48:55 1995.msg

Internet Message Format | 1995-06-03 | 2KB

Received: by webcom.com
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA224015335; Sat, 20 May 1995 22:48:55 -0700
Return-Path: <[e-mail]>
Received: from relay1.geis.com by webcom.com with ESMTP
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA223925329; Sat, 20 May 1995 22:48:51 -0700
Received: by relay1.geis.com
    (1.37.109.11/15.6) id AA009945508; Sun, 21 May 1995 05:51:48 GMT
From: [e-mail]
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 21 May 95 05:33:00 UTC
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: Decals
X-Genie-Id: 2580904
X-Genie-From: N.MAPLES1
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk

Reply:  Item #9316980 from [e-mail]@INET01#

I have to agree with Darren that the visual interactive method of
texturing is some thing that could do with some improvment in
Lightwave. It would speed up the whole process of maping in layout
whitch equals less time spent foolin' around with the program, more
time looking at results, and moving on to the rest of the stuff, and
for most of us 'more' money. I have often gone back to Imagine just to
get a texture map that I could do easier in that program. Every thing
else in Lightwave is so interactive and comfortable why not texture
maping fella's?

...........NORV-MAN



--
[e-mail] sent this message.
To Post a Message           : [e-mail]
Un/Subscription Requests To : [e-mail]
(DIGEST)                 or : [e-mail]
Administrative Items To     : [e-mail]